Problem solving & decision making
14 free practice questions with explanations
PassNova has 14 free Situational Judgement Test (SJT) practice questions on Problem solving & decision making, each with a clear explanation. Practise them in the browser with instant feedback — 100% free, no sign-up, on any device. Updated for 2026.
Problem solving & decision making: example questions & answers
14 worked examples with answers and explanations below. Practise them in the browser with instant feedback on every answer.
You are facing a problem at work that you have never encountered before, and the obvious quick fix you can think of feels like it might cause issues later. What is the MOST appropriate action?
- AApply the quick fix straight away and deal with any problems it causes later, if they actually materialise
- BTake a moment to understand the root cause and weigh options before deciding on the best solution✓
- CChoose whichever solution can be put in place fastest, regardless of what problems it might cause further down the line
- DLeave the problem alone and wait for somebody more experienced to notice it and deal with it themselves
Answer: Understanding the root cause before acting leads to a durable solution and avoids creating bigger problems later.
You need to make a decision but the data you have is incomplete, and waiting for complete data would mean missing an important deadline. What is the MOST appropriate action?
- ADelay the decision until complete data is available and miss the deadline
- BMake a quick decision based on gut feeling alone
- CMake a reasoned decision using the best available information, noting your assumptions and any risks✓
- DPass the decision entirely to someone else
Answer: Making a reasoned, transparent decision with the available information and stated assumptions is the practical way to balance quality and timeliness.
A process your team uses is slow and frustrating, and you have an idea for improving it. However, changing it would affect other teams who rely on the current process. What is the MOST appropriate action?
- AChange the process for your own team straight away without telling the other teams who depend on it
- BDevelop your idea, consult the affected teams, and propose the change with their input✓
- CInsist that every affected team adopts your new process immediately, because it is clearly the better way
- DKeep the idea to yourself to avoid disruption
Answer: Consulting affected stakeholders before changing a shared process produces a workable improvement and avoids unintended disruption.
You are given a task with instructions that seem to contradict each other, and the person who set the task is on leave for a week. The work is needed sooner than that. What is the MOST appropriate action?
- APick one interpretation at random and proceed
- BDo nothing until the task owner returns
- CComplete the task twice, once for each of the two interpretations, so that you are covered whichever one turns out to have been intended
- DIdentify the contradiction, seek clarification from another informed person, and document your reasoning if you must proceed✓
Answer: Seeking clarification from another knowledgeable source and documenting your reasoning resolves the ambiguity responsibly while keeping the work moving.
A recurring technical problem keeps disrupting your work, and you have been applying the same temporary workaround each time. It is taking up increasing amounts of time. What is the MOST appropriate action?
- ACarry on applying the same temporary workaround, since it gets you through each time the problem happens
- BInvestigate or escalate to find a permanent fix for the underlying cause✓
- CWait and hope that the problem is resolved by a future system update at some point
- DIgnore the underlying problem and simply work around it less often than before
Answer: Addressing the root cause rather than repeatedly applying workarounds saves time and properly resolves the problem.
You are evaluating two possible solutions to a business problem. One is cheaper and faster; the other is more expensive but lower-risk and more sustainable. Stakeholders are divided. What is the MOST appropriate action?
- ALet the loudest stakeholder decide
- BAlways choose the cheaper, faster option
- CAlways choose the more expensive, safer option
- DAssess each option against clear criteria and the situation's priorities, then recommend the best-fit option with your reasoning✓
Answer: Evaluating options against explicit criteria and context leads to a justifiable, well-reasoned decision rather than a default choice.
You spot a potential flaw in a plan that senior colleagues have already invested significant time in. You are relatively junior. What is the MOST appropriate action?
- ASay nothing, since the senior colleagues are far more experienced than you and have already committed to the plan
- BRaise your concern respectfully, with your reasoning and evidence, so it can be considered✓
- CTell other junior colleagues about the flaw instead
- DWait until the plan fails and then point it out
Answer: Respectfully raising a well-reasoned concern, regardless of seniority, helps avoid problems and reflects good judgement.
A complex problem has been handed to you, and you are not sure where to start. There are several stakeholders and many moving parts. What is the MOST appropriate action?
- AWait for someone more senior to give you step-by-step instructions
- BBreak the problem down, clarify the goal, identify key stakeholders, and plan an approach before diving in✓
- CStart working on whichever part feels easiest first
- DTackle every part of the problem at the same time so no time is lost
Answer: Breaking a complex problem into parts and planning the approach makes it manageable and reduces the risk of missing something important.
You implemented a solution that you were confident in, but early feedback suggests it is not working as intended. You still believe your approach is sound. What is the MOST appropriate action?
- AStick with your original approach and dismiss the early feedback as people simply not understanding it properly yet
- BAbandon the solution entirely and start again from scratch, without first analysing what has actually gone wrong
- CBlame the people giving the feedback for using the solution incorrectly, and leave your original design in place unchanged
- DObjectively review the feedback and evidence, and adjust your approach if it shows the solution is not working✓
Answer: Objectively reviewing evidence and adapting when needed reflects sound, ego-free decision making rather than defending a flawed solution.
Your manager asks you to choose between several vendors for an important contract. One vendor is run by a former colleague you are friendly with. What is the MOST appropriate action?
- ADeclare the connection and evaluate all vendors objectively against the same criteria✓
- BAvoid choosing them entirely to look impartial
- CLet your manager choose without mentioning the connection
- DChoose your former colleague's company to help them out, since you already know they will do a good job
Answer: Declaring the relationship and applying consistent criteria ensures a fair, transparent decision free of conflicts of interest.
Midway through a task, you discover a much more efficient method that would change how the rest of the team is currently doing the same work. Switching now would cause short-term disruption. What is the MOST appropriate action?
- AShare the method with the team, explain the benefits and trade-offs, and let the team decide how and when to adopt it✓
- BWait until the whole project has finished before mentioning the more efficient method to anybody else on the team at all
- CKeep the better method to yourself and use it only on your own portion of the work, so that your output looks stronger
- DInstruct everybody to switch over to the new method immediately, without discussing the short-term disruption with them first
Answer: Sharing improvements transparently and letting the team weigh the trade-offs benefits everyone and respects collaborative decision making.
You are presented with a solution that is technically impressive but you suspect it is more complicated than the problem actually requires. Others are excited about it. What is the MOST appropriate action?
- AAdd even more features to make it more impressive
- BReject it outright for being too complex
- CAsk whether a simpler solution would meet the need, and weigh the options objectively before deciding✓
- DGo along with the proposed solution because the rest of the team is clearly excited about it and you do not want to dampen that
Answer: Questioning whether a simpler solution suffices and assessing options objectively avoids unnecessary complexity and cost.
A decision needs to be made quickly during a busy shift, and you are the most senior person present, though it is slightly outside your usual area. Customers are waiting. What is the MOST appropriate action?
- AAsk a customer what they think you should do
- BMake any decision at all as quickly as possible, simply so that the queue of waiting customers can be cleared without further delay
- CAvoid making any decision at all until somebody with the right responsibility becomes available, however long that takes
- DMake a sensible decision based on the information and policies you have, and escalate or review it afterwards if needed✓
Answer: Making a sensible, policy-informed decision and reviewing it afterwards balances the need to act with sound judgement.
You have analysed a problem and your conclusion is unexpected and goes against what most people in the team assume to be true. You are confident in your analysis. What is the MOST appropriate action?
- AInsist you are right and refuse to discuss it
- BKeep quiet about your conclusion in order to avoid going against what the rest of the group already believes
- CChange your conclusion to match what the group expects
- DPresent your analysis and reasoning clearly, invite scrutiny, and let the evidence be considered✓
Answer: Presenting your evidence-based conclusion openly and inviting scrutiny supports good decisions and avoids groupthink.