AgilePM Foundation

MoSCoW, Timeboxing & Practices

28 free practice questions with explanations

PassNova has 28 free AgilePM Foundation practice questions on MoSCoW, Timeboxing & Practices, each with a clear explanation. Practise them in the browser with instant feedback — 100% free, no sign-up, on any device. Updated for 2026.

Sample questions

MoSCoW, Timeboxing & Practices: example questions & answers

Here are 6 example questions from this topic. Practise the full set of 28 free in the browser.

  1. What is the recommended minimum proportion of effort that should be allocated to Must Have requirements within a Timebox to provide contingency?

    • A Must Haves should be exactly 25% of the effort
    • B There is no guidance on the balance of Must Haves
    • C Must Haves should account for no more than about 60% of the effort, leaving roughly 40% in Should and Could Haves as contingency
    • D Must Haves should always be 100% of the effort

    Answer: DSDM guidance recommends Must Haves at no more than about 60% of effort, with around 20% Should Have and 20% Could Have, so the Could Haves provide a contingency that protects on-time delivery.

  2. Which MoSCoW category is most likely to be sacrificed first if a Timebox comes under time pressure?

    • A Won't Have this time
    • B Must Have
    • C Should Have
    • D Could Have

    Answer: Could Have requirements are desirable but not vital, so they act as the built-in contingency and are the first to be dropped to protect on-time delivery of the Must Haves.

  3. In DSDM timeboxing, what is meant by the deadline of a Timebox being fixed?

    • A The end date can be extended whenever Must Haves are not finished
    • B The end date is immovable, so scope is flexed via MoSCoW rather than moving the deadline
    • C The Timebox has no defined end date
    • D Only the Could Haves have a fixed deadline

    Answer: A core idea of timeboxing is that the deadline is fixed and protected; if work is at risk, lower-priority requirements are dropped rather than extending the Timebox.

  4. Which three steps describe the typical structure of a DSDM Structured Timebox?

    • A Investigation, Refinement, Consolidation
    • B Plan, Code, Release
    • C Feasibility, Foundations, Deployment
    • D Initiation, Execution, Closure

    Answer: A DSDM Structured Timebox is commonly organised into Investigation, Refinement and Consolidation steps, each closed by a review with the business.

  5. What is the main purpose of a facilitated workshop in DSDM?

    • A To bring the right stakeholders together, guided by an impartial facilitator, to reach high-quality decisions and shared understanding quickly
    • B To replace all written products with verbal agreements
    • C To carry out final acceptance testing of the solution
    • D To allow the project manager to assign tasks without discussion

    Answer: Facilitated workshops use an impartial facilitator to help the right participants collaborate towards agreed, high-quality outcomes far faster than sequential communication.

  6. In DSDM, what is the purpose of iterative development combined with modelling and prototyping?

    • A To remove the need for the Prioritised Requirements List
    • B To finalise every requirement in writing before any building starts
    • C To build understanding progressively and gain fast business feedback, refining the solution rather than attempting it perfectly in one pass
    • D To avoid showing the business anything until deployment

    Answer: Iterative development, supported by modelling and prototyping, lets the team explore and confirm requirements through repeated cycles of building and review with the business.

Start practising MoSCoW, Timeboxing & Practices →