MoSCoW, Timeboxing & Practices
28 free practice questions with explanations
PassNova has 28 free AgilePM Foundation practice questions on MoSCoW, Timeboxing & Practices, each with a clear explanation. Practise them in the browser with instant feedback — 100% free, no sign-up, on any device. Updated for 2026.
MoSCoW, Timeboxing & Practices: example questions & answers
Here are 6 example questions from this topic. Practise the full set of 28 free in the browser.
-
What is the recommended minimum proportion of effort that should be allocated to Must Have requirements within a Timebox to provide contingency?
- A Must Haves should be exactly 25% of the effort
- B There is no guidance on the balance of Must Haves
- C Must Haves should account for no more than about 60% of the effort, leaving roughly 40% in Should and Could Haves as contingency ✓
- D Must Haves should always be 100% of the effort
Answer: DSDM guidance recommends Must Haves at no more than about 60% of effort, with around 20% Should Have and 20% Could Have, so the Could Haves provide a contingency that protects on-time delivery.
-
Which MoSCoW category is most likely to be sacrificed first if a Timebox comes under time pressure?
- A Won't Have this time
- B Must Have
- C Should Have
- D Could Have ✓
Answer: Could Have requirements are desirable but not vital, so they act as the built-in contingency and are the first to be dropped to protect on-time delivery of the Must Haves.
-
In DSDM timeboxing, what is meant by the deadline of a Timebox being fixed?
- A The end date can be extended whenever Must Haves are not finished
- B The end date is immovable, so scope is flexed via MoSCoW rather than moving the deadline ✓
- C The Timebox has no defined end date
- D Only the Could Haves have a fixed deadline
Answer: A core idea of timeboxing is that the deadline is fixed and protected; if work is at risk, lower-priority requirements are dropped rather than extending the Timebox.
-
Which three steps describe the typical structure of a DSDM Structured Timebox?
- A Investigation, Refinement, Consolidation ✓
- B Plan, Code, Release
- C Feasibility, Foundations, Deployment
- D Initiation, Execution, Closure
Answer: A DSDM Structured Timebox is commonly organised into Investigation, Refinement and Consolidation steps, each closed by a review with the business.
-
What is the main purpose of a facilitated workshop in DSDM?
- A To bring the right stakeholders together, guided by an impartial facilitator, to reach high-quality decisions and shared understanding quickly ✓
- B To replace all written products with verbal agreements
- C To carry out final acceptance testing of the solution
- D To allow the project manager to assign tasks without discussion
Answer: Facilitated workshops use an impartial facilitator to help the right participants collaborate towards agreed, high-quality outcomes far faster than sequential communication.
-
In DSDM, what is the purpose of iterative development combined with modelling and prototyping?
- A To remove the need for the Prioritised Requirements List
- B To finalise every requirement in writing before any building starts
- C To build understanding progressively and gain fast business feedback, refining the solution rather than attempting it perfectly in one pass ✓
- D To avoid showing the business anything until deployment
Answer: Iterative development, supported by modelling and prototyping, lets the team explore and confirm requirements through repeated cycles of building and review with the business.